Fox News Chaos: Muslim Candidate’s Wild Question Stuns

Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed turned a Fox News interview about child gender surgery into a question about Jesse Watters’ own body.

Quick Take

  • Abdul El-Sayed, a Michigan Democratic Senate candidate, appeared on “Jesse Watters Primetime” on Fox News in late August 2026.
  • Watters asked El-Sayed if it was acceptable for a parent to let a child get transition surgery, calling it removing a child’s genitalia.
  • El-Sayed responded by asking Watters if he was circumcised, comparing routine circumcision to transgender surgery for minors.
  • Watters pushed back hard, saying “circumcision is different than castration” and calling the comparison “sick stuff.”
  • Federal health reports note there is no international medical consensus on the best pediatric gender care practices.

A Fox News Sit-Down Turns Personal Fast

Abdul El-Sayed, the physician and former public health official running for Senate in Michigan, sat down with Jesse Watters on Fox News in late August. The two clashed over taxes, healthcare, and foreign policy. But one exchange stole the show. Watters pressed El-Sayed on whether parents should be allowed to approve transition surgery for their kids.

Watters did not soften the question. He asked El-Sayed point blank if it was okay for a parent to “slash his kid’s ding-a-ling off,” a blunt description of what happens in some surgical transition procedures for minors. El-Sayed did not answer directly. Instead, he turned the question back on Watters, asking if the host had been circumcised as a baby.

The Circumcision Comparison Draws Fire

Watters admitted he was circumcised. El-Sayed then argued the two procedures were similar since both involve surgery on a child’s body without the child’s own consent. Watters rejected the comparison immediately, telling El-Sayed “circumcision is different than castration,” and calling the entire exchange “sick stuff” on air.

El-Sayed’s underlying position was that these decisions belong to parents and doctors, not government officials. He said health care for minors “is between you and your doctors” and that the state has no business stepping in. That argument treats a decades-old religious and medical practice as equivalent to irreversible surgery tied to a psychological condition, a comparison most parents would reject on its face.

Why The Analogy Falls Apart

Circumcision is a quick, low-risk procedure with religious roots stretching back thousands of years and near-universal acceptance among major medical groups. Transition surgery for minors is irreversible, life-altering, and remains genuinely disputed inside medicine itself. A federal health report released in late 2025 found “no international consensus” on best practices for treating gender dysphoria in children, and said evidence supporting surgical intervention in minors is of very low quality.

The Political Fallout Building In Michigan

The clip spread fast across conservative media and social platforms, with commentators calling El-Sayed’s question about Watters’ body bizarre and evasive. Second Lady Usha Vance also weighed in publicly on the remarks, adding another layer to a story already drawing national attention just months before Michigan voters decide a critical Senate race.

El-Sayed is not backing away from his stance. He continues to frame the surgery debate as a matter of medical privacy rather than public policy, betting that Michigan voters will side with parental rights over restrictions. Given how the interview played out, and how quickly conservatives seized on it, that bet looks shakier by the day for a candidate who dodged a direct question about child surgery by asking about his host’s own anatomy on national television.

Sources:

thegatewaypundit.com, nytimes.com, mediamatters.org, nypost.com, foxnews.com, youtube.com