Left-wing dark money group’s sudden shift from backing to opposing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. raises questions about political motivations and the influence of undisclosed funding in American politics.
Key Takeaways
- The Sixteen Thirty Fund, a left-wing dark money group, is now funding efforts to oppose Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s confirmation as HHS secretary after previously supporting his presidential campaign.
- The group’s “Stop RFK War Room” effort, run by Protect Our Care, accuses Kennedy of spreading misinformation about vaccines and may spend seven figures on digital ads to thwart his nomination.
- The Sixteen Thirty Fund defends its conflicting actions, stating that both efforts align with its progressive values.
- Kennedy’s Senate confirmation hearings have been delayed due to paperwork issues, with no hearings expected before the end of the month.
- A December survey found broad support for Kennedy’s agenda across political lines, despite polarized views of him personally.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund’s Shifting Stance on RFK Jr.
In a surprising turn of events, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a prominent left-wing dark money group, has pivoted from supporting Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential aspirations to actively opposing his nomination as Secretary of Health and Human Services. This dramatic shift highlights the complex and often contradictory nature of political alliances in America’s current landscape.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund initially backed Kennedy’s presidential campaign through a super PAC called Retire Career Politicians. This support included funding advertisements that praised Kennedy’s stance on vaccines, a controversial topic that has been central to his public persona. However, the group’s position has now reversed, with the establishment of a “Stop RFK War Room” effort run by Protect Our Care, an organization that accuses Kennedy of spreading misinformation about vaccines.
The Impact of Dark Money on Political Narratives
The involvement of dark money in this political drama underscores its significant influence on shaping political narratives and strategies. The Sixteen Thirty Fund, which does not disclose its donors to the IRS, may spend up to seven figures on digital ads aimed at thwarting Kennedy’s nomination. This level of financial commitment demonstrates the power that undisclosed entities can wield in American politics.
“We are proud to provide administrative and back-office services to support their (Protect Our Care) work to ensure that Americans can get the high-quality health care they need and deserve” the group said.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund’s justification for its seemingly contradictory actions raises questions about the flexibility of political allegiances. By claiming that both supporting Kennedy’s presidential run and opposing his cabinet nomination align with their progressive values, the organization reveals the complex calculations behind political endorsements and oppositions.
Foreign Influence and Cabinet Nominations
Adding another layer of complexity to this situation is the potential for foreign influence in the opposition to Kennedy’s nomination. Caitlin Sutherland of Americans for Public Trust pointed out a concerning loophole in campaign finance regulations, stating that “there is no prohibition on foreign dollars being used to oppose [a cabinet] nomination.” This revelation raises serious questions about the integrity of the nomination process and the extent of foreign influence in American politics.
“there is no prohibition on foreign dollars being used to oppose [a cabinet] nomination” Sutherland emphasized.
The “War Room” to stop RFK, launched in November, is reportedly heavily backed by Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss. This international connection further complicates the narrative surrounding Kennedy’s nomination and the forces working to influence its outcome.
Public Perception and Political Reality
Despite the concerted efforts to derail Kennedy’s nomination, a December survey revealed broad support for his agenda across political lines. This disconnect between public opinion and the actions of influential political groups highlights the complex dynamics at play in American politics. It also raises questions about the true motivations behind the opposition to Kennedy’s nomination and the extent to which these actions reflect the will of the American people.
As Kennedy’s Senate hearings face delays due to paperwork issues, the political maneuvering continues behind the scenes. The coming weeks will likely see intensified efforts from both supporters and opponents of his nomination, further illuminating the intricate web of alliances and oppositions that define the current political landscape.
Sources:
- Leftist Dark Money Group Opposes RFK Jr. For HHS Secretary After Supporting Presidential Run
- Dark money group that backed RFK Jr. for president opposes HHS confirmation – Washington Examiner
- Scoop: Liberal dark money group plays both sides on RFK Jr.
- Leftist Dark Money Group Opposes RFK Jr. For HHS Secretary After Supporting Presidential Run
