Utah Governor Spencer Cox emphatically declares, “We are not for sale,” as he blocks a Chinese-owned company from purchasing land near Provo Airport, sparking a nationwide conversation on foreign land ownership and national security.
At a Glance
- Utah blocks a land purchase by a Chinese-owned company near Provo Airport.
- Governor Cox emphasizes state sovereignty and security in his decision.
- New state legislation restricts land sales to entities linked to adversarial nations.
- The move reflects a growing national trend of scrutinizing foreign land ownership.
Utah’s Bold Stand on Foreign Land Ownership
In a decisive move that underscores Utah’s commitment to national security, Governor Spencer Cox has blocked a land purchase by Cirrus Aircraft, a company majority-owned by the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC). The purchase was halted due to its proximity to the Provo Airport, a critical infrastructure point that raised significant security concerns. Utah’s action comes on the heels of newly passed legislation designed to prevent adversarial foreign entities from acquiring land near sensitive sites.
The decision reflects a broader national trend where states are increasingly scrutinizing foreign investments, especially from countries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. These nations are often viewed with suspicion due to their strategic interests and potential threats to national security. The blocked purchase is a testament to Utah’s proactive approach in safeguarding its assets against foreign influence.
The Legislative Backbone
Utah’s stance is firmly rooted in legislative measures, notably House Bill 516 and House Bill 430, which were passed in 2024 and 2025, respectively. These bills expand restrictions on land ownership by foreign adversaries and establish robust enforcement mechanisms. The state’s legislature, with significant contributions from Rep. Candice Pierucci, has crafted a legal framework that not only restricts but also mandates the divestment of land holdings by such entities.
The Pentagon’s identification of AVIC as having ties to the People’s Liberation Army further justifies these legislative actions. This designation places additional scrutiny on Chinese-linked companies, ensuring that Utah remains vigilant in protecting its strategic interests.
Implications and Reactions
Utah’s decision to block the land sale has broader implications for both the state and the nation. In the short term, the move prevents a potentially risky acquisition near a vital infrastructure point. However, it also raises concerns about economic impacts, including the potential loss of investment and job opportunities that such a purchase might have brought. Despite these concerns, state officials have prioritized security over economic gain, a stance that resonates with many Utah residents.
Governor Cox’s public statement, “We are not for sale,” captures the sentiment of many who believe that security should not be compromised for financial incentives. Local communities, while recognizing the potential economic opportunities, largely support the state’s decision for its focus on safeguarding Utah’s sovereignty and security.
A Precedent for the Future
The blocked purchase sets a significant precedent for future enforcement of foreign ownership laws. It signifies a shift towards more stringent regulations, not just in Utah but potentially across other states. This move may influence national policy, as other states observe Utah’s proactive measures and consider similar legislation to protect their own strategic assets.
As the geopolitical landscape continues to evolve, the scrutiny of foreign investments, particularly in critical infrastructure, will likely intensify. Utah’s actions highlight the delicate balance between welcoming foreign investment and ensuring national security. The state’s firm stance serves as a model for others grappling with similar challenges in an increasingly interconnected world.
Sources:
National Agricultural Law Center
