CIA Web of Lies EXPOSED—Oswald Connection Unravels

The CIA’s decades-old denials just collapsed—newly released documents confirm a high-level CIA officer had direct contact with Lee Harvey Oswald before and after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, leaving Americans wondering: what else has our government been hiding from us?

At a Glance

Freshly declassified CIA documents confirm a psychological warfare officer ran operations intersecting with Lee Harvey Oswald before and after JFK’s assassination.
This revelation directly contradicts the CIA’s official story maintained for over sixty years.
Calls for full transparency and further investigation into the agency’s activities have reignited among historians and the public.
The CIA’s credibility and the integrity of prior investigations into JFK’s death are under renewed scrutiny.

CIA Cover Story Collapses: New Documents Reveal Direct Contact with Oswald

After more than six decades of smoke and mirrors, the CIA’s web of denials is unraveling. Documents released in July 2025 show that George Joannides, a CIA officer specializing in psychological warfare, operated under the alias “Howard Gebler” and had contact with Lee Harvey Oswald both before and after the Kennedy assassination. For years, the agency claimed it had no operational relationship with Oswald, and no involvement in the events leading up to JFK’s death. But these revelations obliterate that narrative. The newly disclosed memo from January 1963 spells out Joannides’ role, confirming that the CIA’s Miami Division—tasked with anti-Castro operations—was not just tangentially aware of Oswald, but actively engaged with him via the Cuban Student Directorate, a front group funded and directed by the agency.

This is not some wild-eyed conspiracy theory. This is the CIA itself finally cracking open the vault, however reluctantly, and admitting what so many Americans have suspected—that they were running covert games with Oswald while selling the public a sanitized fairy tale. The agency’s official stance, that Oswald was just a lone nut, is now on life support. The question is no longer whether the CIA had contact with Oswald, but why they lied about it for so long, and what else is buried in those still-classified files.

Decades of Denials and Obfuscation: The Agency’s Tattered Credibility

The CIA’s credibility has always been paper thin, but this revelation shreds it outright. Since 1963, the agency has stonewalled Congress, the Warren Commission, the House Select Committee on Assassinations, and the American people. Every time the heat turned up, the agency trotted out the same tired refrain: “We had no operational contact with Oswald.” Now, with these documents in public view, that denial is exposed as a calculated deception. Joannides, the very officer whose role was hidden even from congressional investigators in the 1970s, has emerged as the lynchpin connecting CIA psychological operations to Oswald’s activities in New Orleans and beyond.

In the months leading up to the assassination, Oswald was busy making headlines—handing out pro-Castro literature, clashing with anti-Castro Cuban exiles, and penning letters that would later be published by the DRE, the CIA’s own creation. After JFK was killed, the DRE was quick to blast Oswald’s communist ties across the media. The agency’s fingerprints are all over these operations. What’s clear now is that the CIA was not just a passive observer; they were stage-managing key players in the drama, then lying about it for decades.

Renewed Calls for Transparency and Accountability

With the cover blown, historians, journalists, and anyone who still believes in the concept of government accountability are demanding answers. Jefferson Morley, a leading researcher who has spent years battling the CIA in court, declared, “The cover story for Joannides is officially dead. This is a big deal. The CIA is changing its tune on Lee Harvey Oswald.” These are not the words of a fringe theorist—they are the sober analysis of someone who has watched the agency dodge and weave for a generation. The new evidence has reignited public outrage and placed fresh pressure on the government to declassify all remaining JFK records. The families of Kennedy and Oswald, along with millions of Americans who have been gaslighted by officialdom for decades, deserve the truth. The days of hiding behind “national security” excuses are over. If democracy means anything, it means that the people have a right to know what their government was doing in their name, especially when it comes to the death of a president.

Politically, the consequences are seismic. Every fresh revelation feeds a growing distrust in federal institutions, especially those that have treated transparency as a threat instead of a duty. The intelligence community’s penchant for secrecy has always clashed with the public’s right to know, but this time, the stakes are as high as they get. The fact that it took until 2025—sixty-two years after the assassination—for the CIA to admit even this much should infuriate anyone who cares about constitutional governance and the rule of law. If the agency can lie about this, what else have they lied about? The pressure for full disclosure will not go away, and neither will the questions about what really happened in Dallas in 1963.