A Maricopa County judge steps down from a high-profile Arizona election case, stirring controversy and raising questions about judicial impartiality.
At a Glance
- Judge Bruce Cohen recused himself from an Arizona election lawsuit involving Trump allies
- The recusal followed accusations of bias stemming from an email supporting Vice President Kamala Harris
- The case involves 18 individuals accused of attempting to interfere with the 2020 election results
- Cohen’s decision highlights the importance of maintaining public trust in judicial impartiality
Judge’s Recusal Shakes Up Arizona Election Case
In a significant development, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Bruce Cohen has recused himself from a high-profile Arizona election lawsuit. The case, which involves allegations against Trump allies accused of attempting to misrepresent the 2020 election results, took an unexpected turn when Cohen faced accusations of bias stemming from an email he sent in support of Vice President Kamala Harris.
The controversy arose when defense lawyers for Arizona state Senator Jake Hoffman accused Cohen of harboring “deep-seated personal political bias” and filed a motion for his recusal. The judge’s email, which urged colleagues to defend Vice President Harris against racist and sexist remarks, became the focal point of the criticism.
Really incredible commitment by prosecutors and judges at all levels of government to screw up these cases as much as humanly possible… https://t.co/8e1eVYwHs6
— Jeremy Schulman (@jeremyschulman) November 12, 2024
The Email That Sparked Controversy
Cohen’s email expressed regret for not speaking out when Harris was referred to as a “DEI hire” and criticized former President Trump for reposting vulgar jokes about her. In the message, Cohen emphasized the importance of standing up for colleagues who identify as persons of color.
“We cannot allow our colleagues who identify as being a ‘person of color’ to stand alone when there are those (who) may claim that their ascension was an ‘equity hire’ rather than based solely upon exceptionalism” – Judge Bruce Cohen
While Cohen defended his comments, stating they were not reflective of bias and would apply to any political sphere, the defense team argued that his rhetoric mirrored “hostile partisan political zealotry.” This accusation formed the basis of their motion to dismiss the case.
The “Fake Electors” Case
The lawsuit at the center of this controversy involves 18 individuals, including former Trump aides and lawyers, all of whom have pleaded not guilty. The defendants are accused of attempting to interfere with the 2020 election by producing fraudulent documents claiming Trump won Arizona’s electoral votes.
“Given the statements the judge made, I think it’s appropriate that he recuse himself” – Arizona attorney Mark L. Williams
Among the defendants are 11 Arizona Republicans and seven Trump associates, including high-profile figures such as Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows. The case has already seen some developments, with Jenna Ellis having her charges dropped after agreeing to cooperate with prosecutors, and Loraine Pellegrino pleading guilty to a misdemeanor and receiving probation.
Arizona Judge Bruce Cohen stepped down from a case involving Trump allies after defense attorneys accused him of anti-Trump bias due to past statements.
The accusations followed leaked emails where Cohen expressed concerns about political attacks on Kamala Harris and compared…
— Kelly Hyman (@Kellyhyman1) November 13, 2024
Implications and Next Steps
Cohen’s recusal is expected to impact the proceedings, with emphasis now placed on finding an unbiased replacement. The transition to a new judge may potentially delay the trial, which is currently scheduled for January 2026.
“However, the tone and rhetoric used in motions recently submitted by defense counsel to attack Arizona’s chief legal officer and now the independent judiciary are beyond the pale” – Richie Taylor
This case highlights broader national concerns about election integrity and political narratives. Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has stated that the case is about justice, not politics, and has criticized the defense counsel’s rhetoric. Mayes has also committed to pursuing the case regardless of Trump’s 2024 election outcome, underscoring the gravity of the allegations and the state’s determination to see the legal process through to its conclusion.
Sources:
- Judge Recuses Himself in Arizona Election Case After Kamala Harris Comments
- Judge recuses himself from Arizona ‘fake electors’ case after remarks about Harris attacks
- Judge Recused in Arizona ‘Fake Electors’ Case after Kamala Harris Remark