Nevada Supreme Court Upholds Mail-In Ballot Law Allowing Late Arrivals Without Postmarks

People standing in line holding voting papers.

Nevada’s Supreme Court upholds a controversial mail-in ballot law, allowing late arrivals without postmarks to be counted in future elections.

At a Glance

  • Nevada Supreme Court ruled mail-in ballots can be counted up to three days after Election Day, even without clear postmarks
  • Ballots received by 5 p.m. on the third day post-election are considered valid, regardless of postmark visibility
  • This marks the third consecutive legal defeat for Republicans challenging Nevada’s mail-in voting laws
  • The decision impacts Nevada’s status as a crucial swing state in the 2024 presidential election

Court Upholds Controversial Mail-In Ballot Law

In a significant ruling affecting election integrity in Nevada, the state’s Supreme Court has upheld a law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted up to three days after Election Day, even without clear postmarks. The decision, impacting the upcoming 2024 election, permits election officials to count ballots received by 5 p.m. on the third day following the election, regardless of postmark visibility.

This ruling came despite strong opposition from Republican officials who argued that proper postmarks should be required to ensure election security and prevent potential manipulation of the voting process. The court’s decision marks the third consecutive legal defeat for Republicans challenging Nevada’s mail-in voting laws.

Implications for Election Integrity

The Nevada Supreme Court dismissed Republican arguments that postmarks are essential for verifying ballot submission dates. Instead, the court emphasized the legislative intent to expand voting access and ease, preventing last-minute rule changes before the election. This interpretation aligns with guidance provided by the Nevada Secretary of State’s office, which treats non-postmarked ballots as having “indeterminate” postmarks.

“A mail ballot that has no visible postmark should be interpreted to have an indeterminate postmark, and therefore should be accepted if it has been received by the clerk by mail not later than 5 p.m. on the third day following the election” – the Nevada secretary of state’s office

Republicans argued that the law’s language requires the existence of a postmark for a ballot to be counted. However, the court’s interpretation favored a broader acceptance of ballots, potentially increasing voter participation but raising concerns about election security.

Impact on Future Elections

This ruling significantly affects Nevada’s status as a crucial swing state in the 2024 presidential election. With the state’s closely contested race between Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, the decision could have far-reaching implications for the election outcome.

“We are gratified that the Nevada Supreme Court recognized not only that state laws should be construed to favor the rights of voters to cast their ballots and have them counted, but also that lawsuits like this one so close to the general election tend to promote confusion and chaos rather than orderly democratic processes.” – Bradley Schrager

The court’s decision applies to all future Nevada elections unless legislative changes are made. While supporters argue this ruling protects voter rights, opponents express concerns about potential vulnerabilities in the election process. As the 2024 election approaches, the impact of this ruling on Nevada’s voting landscape remains a topic of intense debate and scrutiny.

Sources:

  1. Nevada Supreme Court Upholds Law on Mail-In Ballots
  2. Nevada Supreme Court rules non-postmarked ballots can be counted within 3 days of election
  3. Nevada Can Count Late Mail-In Ballots in Court Loss for GOP
  4. Nevada Supreme Court rules non-postmarked ballots can be counted within 3 days of election

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR